patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Irked Residents Voice East Street Bridge Concerns

Adding a new traffic light or more noticeable signage were among the solutions discussed Thursday to help alleviate constant accidents in the area.

 

Nearly two months after an MBTA bus crashed into the East Street Bridge, causing area residents to evacuate due to a natural gas leak, the long-standing issue of safety on the road was brought to the forefront by residents and the Westwood's Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety Committee Thursday night. 

Ten residents from the East Street area attended the meeting, all of whom voiced sincere concerns over the safety on East Street, and that of pedestrians in the area near the bridge that has historically been a common site for accidents.  

"I almost lost my family to this stupid bridge," said Jay Knox, who lives in the vicinity. "There are signs everywhere, but that's the thing that's so frustrating. It'd be great if there were something more substantial."  

Various concerns were raised, from the safety of pedestrians under the bridge to the speed of vehicles on East Street that come off the rotary over Rte. 128. Also discussed was the issue of vehicles bouncing off the sidewalk that exists under the bridge, as well as the safety of those pedestrians in the area of Morrison Park. 

"The field is an attraction to children, so we're attracting children to an area that is highly pedestrian unsafe," said local resident Stan Sylvester. "It's a miracle to me that someone hasn't gotten killed while walking under there."

Among the potential solutions discussed were:

  • Speed traps to help slow down traffic.
  • Lights on poles to alert vehicles that they are speeding prior to the bridge.
  • Lights on poles to alert vehicles that they will not fit under the bridge.
  • Removal of existing sidewalks under the bridge so vehicles will not bounce off of them.
  • Overhead signs and chains that would alert larger vehicles prior to entering the overpass.
  • Eliminate the "Right on Red" sign on the corner of Washington and East Streets. 
  • Traffic calming measures in the area of Smith Drive and East Street.
  • New traffic light at the corner of Carroll Avenue and East Street. 

In the past, the notion of raising the bridge has been discussed. 

"Raising the bridge is never going to happen," said Westwood resident Robert McGee Thursday night. "It's humanly impossible to raise that bridge and have a train go over it."

McGee sustained serious injuries in an accident under the bridge nearly eight years ago when a small truck he was driving collided with another vehicle under the bridge. The driver of the other vehicle, a 79-year-old man, was estimated to be driving close to 65 or 70 miles an hour, he said. 

"I will not go under that bridge when someone is coming down from Rte. 128," he said. "It's a free-for-all."

Members across the Committee were more than willing to discuss the issue at length and see how to address the matter. 

"We are very strong towards making a move, because there are many structural concerns with how many times the bridge has been hit," said Committee member Karla Kiosi. "We know the concern and would like to have a stronger voice." 

Committee Chair John Craine suggested that someone from the neighborhood join the committee to help the members stay up-to-date with any concerns, while fellow member Wendy Muellers suggested the residents of the area persist their concerns to the Westwood Board of Selectmen. By doing that, Muellers said, residents could potentially bring forth efforts for a traffic calming study in the same manner as those residents of Dover and Conant Roads during the last year.  

Other residents from the area who enjoy walking up through Islington Center even avoid the bridge altogether, such as Lynn Kaminski, who said she, as an alternative, walks down Carroll Avenue and across the train tracks of Islington Station to get to such venues as CVS

"I want to be a pedestrian, but it's a very difficult thing to do in our neighborhood safely," Kaminski said. 

Much of the neighborhood, Morrison Park and Roche Bros. was evacuated in May after an off-duty MBTA bus fueld with Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) collided with the roof of the bridge, causing the vehicle to spill a large amount of the natural gas. But the issue of a large vehicle colliding with the roof is nothing new. 

"That bus awakened everybody, I hope," McGee said. "That could have been fireworks [. . . ] Something bad is going to happen under that bridge. Really bad. And you're going to remember I told you."

Editor's Note: For clarification purposes, the Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety Committee is in fact a subcommittee of the Westwood Planning Board. Thursday's meeting was not held as a public hearing, but as a regularly-scheduled monthly meeting of the committee. The agenda item of the East Street bridge was an issue that attracted several concerned residents. 

The committee has met frequently for the last three years to discuss various pedestrian and bicycle-related issues and recommend possible solutions for consideration by the Westwood Planning Board and Westwood Board of Selectmen.

The committee is also scheduled to report to the Planning Board on July 10, and the East Street bridge issue is to be reviewed at length by the Metropolitan Area Planning Council (MAPC) as it continues its work on the production of a Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan for Westwood, which is to be funded by a Sustainable Communities grant.

Related Topics: East Street Bridge, MBTA, and Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety Committee

Peter Hack

9:14 am on Friday, June 29, 2012

There is a solution to be found here that matches the traffic calming necessary with the necessary safe passage of pedestrians and vehicles.
In the short term: How about a 1-way traffic light for under the bridge? This would discourage cars from using this route for a cut through, reduce the speed of travel on this section of road, give a pause to drivers with over-height vehicles, widen the lane of travel allowing for a single vehicle lane, a bike lane and a safe pedestrian sidewalk... This solution requires only a set of smart traffic lights, signage, some paint and a bit of effort.

In the Long Term;
Work with the MBTA and the State to address widening the bridge and lowering the street.

Reply

Ed

11:20 pm on Sunday, July 1, 2012

1- A one-way traffic light will create a bottle-neck that'll back up to Washington St. in no time, and possibly impede the egress from the firehouse there, creating yet another safety hazard.

2- A bike lane under there? (shuddering) I'll pass.

3- East St. isn't a side street "cut through," its a main road. There are only two roads that lead from Westwood's "Pan Handle" to Washington St. East, and Everett Streets. That's it. Guess which one was there first? The true problem is that the town hasn't grown with the times. That bridge has been the same width since the horse-and-buggy days. What's needed is another road through to Wash, but private property issues will prevent that.

4- Lowering the street. Now THAT'S a plausable idea. And, the State, and the T have to bite the bullet, and widen the bridge by a few yards. That's the only real solution.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Peter Hack

1:21 am on Saturday, July 7, 2012

There is a solution to be found... Not necessarily that mine was the right one. I understand the need for thoroughfares between the east and west sides of town, I was only making a suggestion that answers the immediate concerns; slowing down traffic, giving pause to drivers, and reducing traffic on east street by making it an unattractive option to commuters who don't need to use this roadway. As for emergency vehicles, the one-way light could be coordinated with the emergency signaling infrastructure. Lastly, with reduced speed and a single lane of traffic the bicycle and pedestrian options become possible. Can't solve the issue that drivers in Massachusetts can't navigate a rotary... Sounds like a licensing problem.

My fear of the signage (active or passive) is that it doesn't solve any of these concerns and is only a reactionary response that requires a competent driver to read the signs, know their vehicle height, or at a minimum pay attention. There are numerous cases where the signs, chains, bells, and sirens are ignored. For some humor read the following comments regarding the success of Storrow Drive's attempts:

http://www.universalhub.com/node/26576
http://www.universalhub.com/2011/tractor-trailer-storrow-drive-what-could-go-wrong

As a point of fact, I do travel East St. often and selfishly wouldn't want a one way light but I could manage around it if I had to. In any case, I am glad my comment sparked some continued discussion.

Dick Bean

1:44 pm on Monday, July 2, 2012

I agree with Ed on no one-way traffic light! The traffic from the East Street rotary towards Islington Center during the evening rush hour is already backed up over the bridge over Route 1 (and to Smith Drive at times) so a one-way traffic light would probably back traffic up onto the East Street rotary, thus blocking rotary traffic going to Canton Street and the other side of East Street towards Dedham. That rotary is already in the top ten in the state for accidents so let's not try for a number one rating for accidents there by adding a one-way light to the Islington Bridge. Ed's comments about Washington Street being adversely affected are right, but don't forget the adverse effect that would be caused in the other direction as well.

If neighbors agree to it, try hanging signs like those on Storrow Drive to wake up those drivers with tall vehicles (pictures posted elsewhere in the Patch "Pics and Clips" photo gallery - "If you hit this sign you will hit that bridge").

Lowering the road might be a problem for the homes immediately adjacent to the bridge, but our town officials should be actively working this problem with the MBTA. I did not see this posted as a topic on the agenda at any of the Selectmen's meetings since the bus accident even though I wrote to the Selectmen's office right after the bus accident to express concern and request proactive efforts. What will it take, a fatality? I hope not.

Reply

Leave a comment